I CORINTHIANS CHAPTER 13 

1  Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not love, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal. 
2 And though I have the gift of prophecy, and understand all mysteries, and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not love, I am nothing. 
3 And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, and though I give my body to be burned, and have not love, it profiteth me nothing. 
4  Love suffereth long, and is kind; love envieth not; love vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, 
5 Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; 
6 Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; 
7 Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. 
8  Love never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. 
9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part. 
10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away. 
11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things. 
12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known. 
13 And now abideth faith, hope, love, these three; but the greatest of these is love. 
sent week of sept. 8, 2002
WHY SADDAM DOESN'T NEED MISSILES.
(And how daddy bush and Regan (who can't recall) helped)NOR NUKES and the fact that he has not already used these "techniques" described as follows means that he probably WILL IF w. had his IDIOT way and starts a war with IRAQ. ===>>>((( NO))) WAR!!! <<<===
by Janine Zacharia 

JERUSALEM, ISRAEL
The scenes are grimly familiar. In the Gaza Strip, Palestinian children
carrying rifles chant, "Ya Saddam! Ya Saddam!" and goad the Iraqi leader
to lob Scud missiles at Israel. Up the Mediterranean coast, in the
basement of a Tel Aviv kindergarten, 20 teachers watch a female soldier
demonstrate how to administer atropine, an anti-nerve-gas agent, to
students. The Israeli army's home-front command is urging citizens to
upgrade old gas masks and take home iodine pills in case Saddam Hussein
sends a missile into Israel's nuclear reactor and radiation leaks out.
On August 21 Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and his top security advisers
ordered the immunization of emergency "first-response teams" against
smallpox, a virus Saddam is believed to be able to mount on his Scuds,
and they continue to discuss a population-wide inoculation. And Israel
has scattered Arrow anti-missile batteries across the country to defend
against an Iraqi attack.
It's not hard to understand why Israelis worry about missiles. In 1991
Saddam fired 39 Scuds at the Jewish state. Back then Israelis got lucky:
No one was killed by the conventional missiles, and Iraq fitted 25 Scuds
with germ warheads only to abandon them--in part out of fear of a
potential Israeli nuclear response and in part because Saddam recognized
that his rule was not necessarily threatened. This time, with regime
change the American goal, that logic might not contain him. "If the
administration goes ahead with a plan to remove Saddam ... he will have
every incentive to attack Israel with the goal of killing as many as
possible," says one U.S. intelligence source. "The countermeasures
available may be similar, but the Iraqi calculation on the risks of
hitting Israel will be different." 
Still, while the Israeli public focuses on a missile attack, Israeli
security and terrorism experts quietly worry about a more sinister
prospect: that Saddam could equip Palestinian militants with deadly
biological pathogens that, if disbursed clandestinely, could go
undetected until scores of people fall ill. The missile threat certainly
exists. Even one Scud topped with a nonconventional warhead could cause
considerable damage and even more chaos. But Israel has spent the last
eleven years bolstering what military analysts call "active" and
"passive" defense measures; and over the same period Iraq's missile
capability has withered under years of U.N. sanctions. A veteran Israeli
military planner estimates that Saddam has just 15 Scuds left and is
confident that Israel could knock them out of the sky with its Arrows.
And if one missile does penetrate, Israel has one of the best response
programs in the world for isolating the area and treating the victims.
"Israel has the best regimented system of civil defense," says former
Mossad deputy head Uzi Arad, now director of the Institute of Policy and
Strategy at Herzliya's Interdisciplinary Center (IDC). "The level of
damage [Saddam] can cause Israel has been reduced to very little." None
of this, sadly, can be said about a nonconventional terrorist attack,
one that would combine Iraqi weapons with Palestinian guerrilla skills. 

here are plenty of signs that Saddam is trying to ally himself with
Palestinian militants. On August 12 the Palestine Liberation
Organization's (PLO) hard-line foreign minister, Farouq Qaddoumi,
visited Baghdad to confer with his Iraqi counterpart, Naji Sabri. Last
year Fuad Shubaki, a senior financial adviser to Yasir Arafat, secretly
visited Baghdad. Saddam shelters several prominent Palestinian terrorist
organizations in Baghdad, some of which are active in the Gaza Strip and
West Bank--including the Arab Liberation Front, a terrorist faction of

the PLO that rejects the peace process and coordinates payments to
families of suicide bombers. For years Saddam backed the Palestine
Liberation Front, headed by Abu Abbas, who carried out the 1985 Achille
Lauro cruise ship hijacking; and Saddam has sheltered the infamous Abu
Nidal Organization, the namesake of which was reported on August 19 to
be dead in Iraq. All these groups have offices in Baghdad and receive
training, logistical assistance, and financial aid from the Iraqi
leadership. "With the PLO structure historically, and until now, there
are factions--two to three--that are well-known to be pro-Saddam
Hussein, and they are still on the payroll of the Iraqi government, and
they are widely viewed as an Iraqi intelligence tool," one U.S.
government expert on Iraq says. "Those factions have constituencies and
active cells within the [Palestinian Authority] areas." With his
handsome payments of $25,000 for each suicide bomber's family, Saddam is
arguably the most popular figure in Palestine today. 
Now Saddam's weapons and the P.A.'s goals may be converging. Israeli
intelligence repeatedly warns of the "mega-terror" bomb the Palestinians
hope to devise, one that will boost their killing potential. To that
end, Palestinian bombers have already tried several times to go
nonconventional, albeit in rudimentary ways. Last December a suicide
bomber soaked the nails placed in the explosive in rat poison. The body
of one June 2001 suicide bomber was discovered to be infected with
hepatitis; Israeli intelligence claimed the Palestinians deliberately
chose someone with the disease to see if it would infect victims. The
bombing of an Israeli hotel that killed 29 at a Passover seder in March,
according to the IDF, was originally planned as a cyanide gas attack
that might have killed many more. The head of Israeli military
intelligence later said the plot was scrapped at the last minute because
of technical difficulties. 
That's where Saddam comes in. He still has chemical capabilities,
experts say, including nerve gas, which can--among other
evils--effectively contaminate a water system. But by most accounts, his
easy-to-disguise biological warfare program is believed to have made the
most progress since U.N. inspectors left Iraq with their mission
unfulfilled in December 1998. And Saddam, says Dany Shoham, a veteran
Israeli military intelligence analyst and a nonconventional-weapons
expert, "has a special affinity for biological weapons ... which are
much more dreadful." Earlier this month an American spy satellite
photographed a convoy of 60 trucks at a known biological weapons factory
near Taji--which after the Gulf war was found to have produced hundreds
of liters of botulinum toxin. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld spoke
openly recently about Saddam's mobile biological warfare laboratories.
Biological weaponry "is the thing that worries me more than anything
else, because [Saddam] was very successful at hiding a lot of the
biological stuff from unscom even before he threw the inspectors out,"
says one senior U.S. administration official. In 1998, before the launch
of Desert Fox--a limited U.S. strike on Iraq designed to punish Saddam's
intransigence over U.N. weapons inspections--the United States shipped
sophisticated biological-weaponry-detection equipment to Israel under
the rubric of an exercise with European forces, one former official
involved in the planning explains. And according to an intelligence
report submitted to Prime Minister Tony Blair and first reported by The
Times of London on August 3, Saddam is suspected of planning to arm a
Palestinian terrorist group with biological weapons to attack either
American or Israeli targets. "The Palestinian connection is now at the
heart of intelligence thinking," the newspaper said. 

Why would Saddam arm the Palestinians rather than just use these weapons
against Israel himself? For one thing, it's hard to predict how such
biological agents could be effectively dispersed. The agents at Saddam's
disposal, according to varying reports, include botulinum toxin,
anthrax, ricin, smallpox, and maybe the Ebola virus--the hardest of all
to distribute. No one knows how these would behave on top of a missile
in sweltering heat. They could burn up in flight or land among Arabs in
the West Bank or even in Jordan. Israeli officials worry that to get
around this problem, Saddam might slam a kamikaze plane into an Israeli
city or send a drone to crop-dust an area with his nonconventional
arsenal. A CIA report earlier this year said Iraq has been converting
l-29 trainer aircraft into pilotless vehicles "for delivery of chemical,
or more likely, biological warfare agents." But a drone, like a missile,
can be shot down. 
Which is why the easiest way for Saddam to circumvent these difficulties
may be simply to equip a Palestinian terrorist with a slightly modified
aerosol can, replace the deodorant with a test-tube-sized amount of
smallpox (which is highly contagious and easily transmittable by air),
and have the terrorist spray the virus in a shopping mall, movie
theater, or school. If the terrorist wants to avoid the risk that the
illness will spread to the Palestinian territories via contagious
viruses like smallpox, he could always use other agents--for instance,
botulinum and ricin--to sabotage Israel's water system. Or he could use
high-grade powdered anthrax, like that sent by U.S. mail. It would be
enough, says Shoham "to open a test tube and shake it. ... If he is more
sophisticated he could put it in the ventilation of the Azrieli
building," a Tel Aviv skyscraper. Experts say it could take a few days
before people began detecting symptoms of illness, which would make the
perpetrator harder to detect and would give Saddam--the once-removed
source of the attack--even more cover. 
Of course, Saddam may not desire cover: He might want Israel--and more
importantly the Arab world--to know the destruction was his. But if his
goal is simply to kill as many Israelis as possible as easily as
possible, smuggling a syringe into the Palestinian territories may be
more effective than a missile. After all, today Saddam has a strategic
asset that wasn't available during the Gulf war: a militant Palestinian
population willing, even eager, to die in the fight against the Jewish
state. 

Copyright 2002, The New Republic
----------
Now the good ol' usa gave sadam whoosane his weapons in the first place for the Almighty Dollar!
--------------
When the "good" people of the Dubya adminstration are questioned about anything like Rumsfield they tend to
give the informative type of replies such as:
===> Rumsfeld absolutely refused to answer any of them. Instead, he offered
this regarding our utter lack of meaningful data to support a conflict:
"The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence."  <==
------------
IS THIS NOT TRUE....

> The enemy of my enemy is my customer: Iraq and the Bush administrations
>
> By Margie Burns
> Online Journal Contributing Writer
>
> http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/Burns090502/burns090502.html
>
>
> September 5, 2002-Saddam Hussein received tremendous help from
> residents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, and from US corporations,
> and continues to receive passive economic assistance from the current
> Bush administration. One article could hardly list everything the Reagan
> and Bush administrations have given Iraq, but even a quick overview
> suggests the picture.
>
> Reagan official Howard Teicher was a staffer for the National Security
> Council from 1982 to 1987, where he had regular contact with CIA
> Director William Casey and traveled with Donald Rumsfeld to Iraq. In a
> 1995 affidavit for a civil lawsuit, Teicher describes Reagan's Iraq
> policy as one of consistent, unequivocal support for Saddam Hussein in
> the war against Iran, when Iran was perceived to be the greater threat
> (to Saudi Arabia).
>
> "CIA Director Casey personally spearheaded the effort to ensure that
> Iraq had sufficient military weapons, ammunition and vehicles to avoid
> losing the Iran-Iraq war . . . the United States actively supported the
> Iraqi war effort by supplying the Iraqis with billions of dollars of
> credits, by providing US military intelligence and advice to the Iraqis,
> and by closely monitoring third country arms sales to Iraq to make sure
> Iraq had the military weaponry required. The United States also
> provide strategic operational advice to the Iraqis to better use their
> assets in combat. For example, in 1986, President Reagan sent a secret
> message to Saddam Hussein telling him that Iraq should step up its air
> war and bombing of Iran. This message was delivered by Vice President
> Bush who communicated it to Egyptian President Mubarak, who in turn
> passed the message to Saddam Hussein. Similar . . . advice was passed to
> Saddam Hussein through various meetings with European and Middle Eastern
> heads of state," Teicher said.
>
> "I personally attended meetings in which CIA Director Casey or CIA
> Deputy Director Gates noted the need for Iraq to have certain weapons
> such as cluster bombs and anti-armor penetrators in order to stave off
> the Iranian attacks. When I joined the NSC staff in early 1982, CIA
> Director Casey was adamant that cluster bombs were a perfect 'force
> multiplier' that would allow the Iraqis to defend against the 'human
> waves' of Iranian attackers. I recorded those comments in the minutes .
> . . ," Teicher noted.
>
> Teicher's NSC files are in the Ronald Reagan presidential archives in
> Simi Valley, California. The affidavit can be found online under "Real
> History Archives."
>
> Moving to direct military aid, in 1982 President Reagan legalized
> conventional military sales to Iraq. Resulting sales amounted to more
> than a billion dollars' worth of exports with military ends.
>
> Along with intelligence-if you call it that-and money and arms, the
> United States also furnished Saddam with biological and chemical
> capabilities.
>
> The US Department of Commerce licensed 70 biological exports to Iraq
> between 1985 and 1989, including at least 21 batches of lethal strains
> of anthrax, sent by the American Type Culture Collection, then situated
> in Rockville and now in Virginia. (It shares one building with George
> Mason University.) Shipments continued beyond Reagan under President
> Bush, after the Iran-Iraq war ended in 1988. In other words, Saddam
> Hussein was still able to purchase biological products for at least four
> more years after the justification of US/administration worry about Iran
> was past.
>
> Also between 1985 and 1989, Iraq's Atomic Energy Commission got 17
> batches of "various toxins and bacteria." In 1985, the CDC (Centers for
> Disease Control) shipped at least three samples of West Nile Fever virus
> to Basra University. Other lethal samples included botulins and E. coli.
>
> In 1994, Senator Don Riegle (D-MI, 1976-94) reported a list of lethal
> bio-products sent to Iraq. Their presence was verified by UN inspectors
> in Iraq.
>
> Too many US corporations supplied Iraq with chemicals to list here; a
> class-action lawsuit filed by more than a thousand Gulf War vets in
> Galveston, Texas, in 1994 (Coleman et al v Alcolac et al) names several,
> including Alcolac, Phillips Petroleum, Unilever, Allied Signal, and
> Teledyne. The trial judge is Ben Hardin.
>
> However, the Texas Supreme Court has now dismissed the American Type
> Culture Collection as a defendant, saying it cannot be sued in a Texas
> state court because it has no Texas location; the federal district court
> for south Texas had already dismissed the case for lack of federal
> jurisdiction. Those GOP judges and your tax dollars at work.
>
> Aside from biological and chemical products, American companies were
> also licensed by the Commerce Department to supply Saddam with
> computers, components, electronics, and specialized equipment for future
> weaponry.
> Other shipments went to Iraq without benefit of licensing. The late
> Congressman Henry B. Gonzalez (D-Texas) of San Antonio, chairman of the
> House Banking Committee, entered at least 30 documents into the
> Congressional Record as
> part of his heroic investigations into US assistance to
> Iraq-investigations in which he was thwarted at every juncture, be it
> noted, by the CIA, the Bush I Department of Justice, and their
> supporters-mostly GOP-in Congress. (See
> www.fas.org/spp/starwars/congress/1991 and 1992.)
>
> Again, too many companies provided essential assistance to Iraq to list
> here. A scant list would include 60 Hughes helicopters in 1982, at least
> 56 military helicopters from Bell Textron in 1984, and $8 million worth
> of Sikorsky Black Hawk helicopters in the late '80s; equipment for a
> tungsten-carbide manufacturing plant (later blown up) from Kennametal
> (Latrobe, Pa.); mainframes and other advanced computer systems from
> Digital, IBM, and Hewlett Packard; a supercomputer from Silicon Graphics
> in CA; and military technology including glass fiber and machine tools
> from Matrix-Churchill (based in Britain and Cleveland, Ohio).
> Matrix-Churchill also sold equipment to an arms
> dealer and manufacturer in Chile, Carlos Cardoen, who sent it to Iraq.
> The lawsuit in which Teicher's affidavit is filed involves Cardoen.
>
> Congressional committees in both the House and the Senate in the early
> '90s documented extensive provisions to Iraq. A report by Rep. Samuel
> Gejdenson (D-CT) stated, "From 1985 to 1990, the United States
> Government approved 771
> licenses for the export to Iraq of $1.5 billion worth of biological
> agents and high-tech equipment with military application." Every
> significant decision approving the numerous pricey deals with Iraq was
> made at the highest levels of government, and involved federal agencies,
> including not only the CIA, the DOJ and the DIA but also the
> Export-Import Bank, the Commerce Department, and the Agriculture
> Department among others.
>
> It is a mark of the current Bush administration's disregard for
> accountability that it does not say where the much-touted "weapons of
> mass destruction" came from (nor that they've been extensively bombed
> already). But then, the same corporations that profited by dealing with
> Iraq before-including Vice President Cheney's Halliburton-would also
> profit from an illegal invasion of Iraq, and from a "rebuilding"
> afterward. The same companies are well able to purchase both Bush
> foreign policy and the bloodthirsty commentary that supports it-defying
> reason, evidence, and common sense-in the corporate media.
>
> There can be little doubt that the whole get-Saddam campaign is bogus on
> moral
> grounds. Iraq depends for existence on its oil revenues (as even the CIA
> World Fact Book shows). It would go under if not for exporting oil. And
> it exports oil to US allies: Russia, France, Switzerland, Jordan and
> Turkey. But far from dampening that oil commerce, Bush's saber-rattling
> has boosted oil prices for Saddam (as well as for Bush campaign donors
> in the American energy sector).
>
> But then, it would be ethically inconsistent for Bush to pressure US
> allies to keep them from doing what the administration itself does. As
> of last May, the American Petroleum Institute listed Iraq number eight
> on the top 10 list of foreign suppliers of oil to the US.
>
> A year earlier, indeed, the US got more than 90 percent of Iraq's
> UN-approved oil-for-food deals; now those UN-certified oil sales are
> dropping-which means that Putin's Russia can become a bigger customer
> for Iraqi oil, through backdoor deals that release Putin from UN
> constraints.
>
> Most observers agree by now that the porous administration "sanctions"
> against Iraq have done more to injure the Iraqi populace than to injure
> Saddam Hussein. There is only too much reason to believe that, if the
> administration were (illegally and unconstitutionally) to replace
> Saddam with a Bush White House puppet, such as the one in Afghanistan,
> the main beneficiaries would similarly be not the Iraqi people but the
> largest oil companies, the largest technology companies, and
> incidentally the demented "think tanks" and other white-collar goon
> squads they hire in Washington and New York
>
----------
of course the average American has a hard time finding out these "truths" what with such as:
brainwashed as they are by right wing media whores using techniques of www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/brainwash.htm
and now we have in our even now mostly controlled press (except for a while now at least the internet) attempts for even more control by the few:
----------
> F.C.C. Weighs a Sharp Easing of Size Limits on Big Media
> 
> By STEPHEN LABATON
> 
> http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/07/business/media/07MEDI.html
> 
> WASHINGTON, Sept. 6 - The Federal Communications Commission is preparing
> to consider sharply relaxing the rules that limit the nation's largest
> media conglomerates from becoming any bigger.
> 
> In response to a series of court opinions that questioned the
> justifications for the existing rules, the agency will formally begin a
> rule-making process next week that is widely expected to lead to the
> most significant regulatory overhaul since the telecommunications laws
> were rewritten nearly six years ago.
> 
> "This is a very significant act by the commission," said Richard E.
> Wiley, a former F.C.C chairman whose law firm, Wiley, Rein & Fielding,
> now represents many broadcasting and newspaper organizations that are
> seeking to have some of the rules repealed or loosened. "At long last,
> these rules are getting a total scrubbing."
> 
> The ownership rules that the commission will reconsider restrict a
> newspaper from owning a TV station in the same city. They prevent a
> media conglomerate from owning two television networks. They prohibit a
> network from owning stations that broadcast to more than 35 percent of
> the nation's homes. They restrict a broadcaster from owning two
> television stations in the same market unless there are at least eight
> other competitors. And they restrict a company from owning more than
> eight radio stations in the same market.
> 
> Industry executives and lawyers said that some of the rules, like the 35
> percent limit, may not be scuttled entirely because they are supported
> by powerful corporate interests. The stations affiliated with the
> networks and one of the industry's well-placed trade groups, the
> National Association of Broadcasters, have mounted a strong campaign
> against the effort of the networks to repeal the rule. That fight is now
> expected to take on new vigor at the commission and in Congress.
> 
> "There is a strong sense in Congress that you need more owners, not
> fewer owners," said Alan Frank, the chairman of the Network Affiliated
> Stations Alliance and the president of Post-Newsweek Stations, the unit
> of the Washington Post Company that owns five network-affiliated
> stations and one unaffiliated station.
> 
> Other regulations, like the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership rule,
> have no similar kinds of industrial support. But they are supported by
> some members of Congress, like Senator Ernest F. Hollings, the South
> Carolina Democrat who is chairman of the Commerce Committee, who has
> repeatedly made clear to the F.C.C. that he would oppose efforts to
> modify the ownership rules. 
> 
> The rules were written to encourage diversity of voices on the airwaves
> and competition among media outlets, and to prevent the biggest
> companies from becoming too powerful in controlling news and
> entertainment. The original basis for some of them grew out of fears of
> the experience before World War II when totalitarian governments in
> Europe and Asia controlled all media outlets. But some conglomerates,
> like Viacom and the News Corporation, have already bumped up against the
> limits of the rules. 
> 
> In a series of rulings over the last two years in cases brought by
> different companies, the federal appeals court here has repeatedly
> criticized the F.C.C. for failing to justify adequately the rules in an
> era in which consumers have access to cable and satellite television
> systems that offer hundreds of channels, as well as the unlimited
> offerings of the Internet. 
> 
> Next Thursday, the agency is expected to approve an order that starts
> the rule-making process. While it does not specify the direction the
> agency intends to take as it reconsiders the rules, experts say that
> they have no doubt that the proceedings are all but certain to conclude
> next year with most of the regulations either abandoned or broadly
> loosened.
> 
> "This will ultimately allow efficiencies through consolidation that Wall
> Street will applaud," said Blair Levin, a former top official at the
> commission who is now an analyst at Legg Mason. "The critical question
> is what does it do to diversity of voice. It's unlikely that it will
> increase it. But the question is does it damage it."
> 
> The move begins to fulfill the long-held vision of Michael K. Powell,
> the agency's chairman. As an F.C.C. commissioner during the 1990's and
> as chairman under President Bush, Mr. Powell has consistently voiced
> deep skepticism about the ownership rules, saying that they were based
> more on a hunch and intuition than on strong empirical evidence that
> they actually promote diversity and competition. At least two other
> members of the five-person commission are also known to be critical of
> the old rules.
> 
> "Powell has had a very clear point of view throughout his term at the
> commission, which is that a lot of these rules need to be looked at
> right away and most of them are no longer valid," Mr. Levin said. "He
> believes the media world has changed dramatically and needs a strong
> look."
> 
> Still, Mr. Powell has moved slowly in taking on the rules, embarking on
> a strategy that he hopes will pass muster in the courts and not provoke
> new fights with some lawmakers on Capitol Hill who support many of the
> rules. Rather than announcing their wholesale abandonment, Mr. Powell
> has set up a special task force and commissioned a set of studies that
> many lawyers and experts expect will conclude that they are no longer
> necessary to promote diversity and competition. The studies are expected
> to be completed next month. 
> 
> -- 
> "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty
> when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are
> naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded
> rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment
> by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding." 
> - Justice Louis D. Brandeis



I mean, gee whiz. WHO of YOU will be the FIRST to say in the house "HEY, you know, if Pres. 
Dubya, starts a ruckus, we should not give him and his war making friends any money to do it and further more unless he cleans up his act about the war thing and trying to take away constitutional rights of American citizens by jumping up and down like the monkey he is trying to push his "Homeland Security" bills through as they are written and posted (at least the parts that are non-top-secret) at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov
Let's get started right away and IMPEACH him.
Also the economy. Also the enviornment. Also our relationship with foreign governments. Its all going to hell in a hand basket as w. does his best to find ways to enrich his already rich friends. 
SOMEONE OF YOU... TELL ME WHERE I AM WAY OFF BASE?!?! I have been writing a lot of you for several weeks with all kinds of facts and figures from other people but as yet receive not one response from any of you other than automated thank you for writings.
Boy oh Boy. Just like the Firemen that are not showing up in NY NY for w. and his yaking soon as w. cut their benefits but gave IBM $1,000,000,000 one day, airlines $15,000,000,000, spent at least $30,000,000,000 on "HomeLand Security" that damn few know where all the money is going or went, etc. etc. etc. And of course the Trillion=$1,000,000,000,000.000 ! dollar "tax" cut giving the average American $300, then w.'s brain causing the economy to still suffer, despite everything the FED does as far as interest rates, with probably >90% of the "Tax Cut" going to those "Americans" that have 99% of the total income already of all Americans!
Thanks a lot! Keep up the good work you guys.
I just think maybe if you try just a bit harder you could maybe you think do a little better with a bit more:
HOOTSPA!!!
GUTS?!?!?
IMPEACH W.!!!! AND DICKEY 2!!!
OUR children will have to pay for our national debt that was being paid for by surpluses that were just handed to the rich few! 
Yes, most of you Republican's as we all know from the right wing media whores your LOVERS of MONEY friends support as well as your campaigns...
ITS ALL BILL CLINTON's PENIS' FAULT!!!
It may be a little early but...
HO HO HO MERRY CHRISTMAS...
HAPPY NEW YEAR...
hopefully if enough of this truth gets out in time a WAR will be prevented and DEMS will REALLY control congress come January and this non-sence of w. and his administration can be somehow niped in the BUD!
The drunk driver is driving this presidency! IMPEACH HIM and his VICE helper!!! PLEEEESE!!
love you all...
kirk
HI!! Everyone, most with some respect! 
I will be writing you repeatedly urging you not to let w., a.k.a.. our current USA president lead this nation to a disaster of a war with Iraq in which surely thousands of PEOPLE will die with the "hope?!" that maybe the USA will "get whooooosane!"; yeah just like we "got Ben Laden!" I repeat, THOUSANDS of PEOPLE WILL MOST LIKELY DIE in such a war and maybe MANY MORE and I can not see were it will not just add fuel to the fires of hatred as far as the tourists are concerned. 
The only good the could possibly come from it would be the ENRICHING OF THE RICH FRIENDS OF W. AND TRICKY DICKEY 2 AND THEIR ADMINISTRATION i.e. the war machinery makers and chemical plants and petroleum industry. 
The "dessert storm" BS which KILLED HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE used BILLIONS OF GALLONS OF OIL/FUEL, MILLIONS OF TONS OF BOMBS/CHEMICALS were used, BILLIONS MADE FOR THE RICH FEW KILLING THE MANY INNOCENT PEOPLE WITH NO CHOICE BUT TO FIGHT THE WARS!!! 
What for example do we do in this country if one refuses the draft? And what about dictatorship regimes? MANY OF THOSE KILLED IN THE "pAtRiOrIOtIc (sic) dessert storm" were mere CHILDREN! 
PEACE AT ALL COSTS! 
GO AHEAD AND REMOVE AND BRING TO JUSTICE WHOOOOOOSANE but only jeopardizing AS FEW OTHER LIVES AS POSSIBLE!!! 
Is it NOT true? That USA satellites can practically "see" something as small as a postage stamp from outer space? And also I can only imagine what fancy gizmos and listening and seeing devices are "top secret!!!". AND you politicians tell us AMERICANS that you can NOT just "take out" Sadam Whooosane without killing thousands of other people!?? What kinds of morons do you think all of us are??!? Come on! Some of you got to make some sence some time. USE YOUR MILLITARY INTELLEGENCE AND TAKE YOUR TIME AND JUST GET "WHOOOOSANE" ===> NO ONE ELSE <=== (maybe some of his evil buddies even if it maybe means that some of these "buddies" are why it has not been done a long time ago and some still think we should go to "WAR" with IRAQ killing thousands of ==> PEOPLE, MANY, MANY just CHILDREN <== just to enrich the oil and chemical mobsters of the usa, ie the fuel to fuel the war machines and the chemicals to make the bullets and bombs and other such "weapons of mass destruction MADE IN THE USA!"!!!!
Was it not "REGAN" (another BAD actor at best at being a "president of the usa") that passed some "law and/or treaty and/or agreement" that no assinations of country leaders were to take place? In the case of Sadam Whooooosane this is just nonsence and outrageous if it leads in "its" application to killing of THOUSANDS of ===> PEOPLE, MANY OF THEM MERE CHILDREN, JUST LIKE DESERT STORM, rah, rah, flag wave, yellow ribbon, hoop-la, bull-shit!
NO, NO, NO, war with IRAQ!!!
NO ONE in there right mind would support such a idiotic idea!
Go ahead and kill anyway you can Sadam Whooosane! I really think some of you know why he still is in power and have something to do with it!
I am NOT a terrorist. My heart just bleeds from the "killing and hell of "wars" being "AMERICA’s NEW ones or not"
How does one ever win a:
"WAR ON TERROR?!?"
Its impossible by causing much more terror and when you have someone as evil as I think w. and trickey dickey 2 as leaders of the executive branch of the usa!
Note that I am not a fighter and trust that God will eventually win and love will conquer all. 
But if you really start to think about it, who the "terrorists" are,
IMPEACHMENT is a legal threat and obviously at this point justified for George W. Bush and Dick Cheney!
======> ALSO!!
I AM NOT AT ALL HAPPY WITH A LOT OF THE CURRENT "HOMELAND SECURITY" BILL(S) as they now appear as listed on the www.whitehouse.gov site!
THEY GIVE THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH WAY TOO MUCH POWER and POTENTIAL FOR ABUSE AND WILL I AM AFRAID AS:
POWER CORRUPTS AND ABSOULTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY!
WILL ERRODE SIGNIFICANTLY AND TRAGICALLY THE RIGHTS GAURENTEED THE USA CITIZENS UNDER THE USA CONSTITUTION AND ITS ADMENDMENTS PARTICULARLY THE BILL OF RIGHTS!!!
PLEASE, DO ==> NOT <== RUSH this DAMN "HOMELAND SECURITY" bill(s) through the senate and house until MUCH SERIOUS AND DELIBERATE DEBATE is conducted and ==> NOT <=== UNTIL the NEXT REPS. and SENS. are SEATED NEXT JANUARY!!!!!
THIS APPLIES TO ANY MILITARY ACTION IN IRAQ AS WELL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF POSSIBLE COVERTY "TAKING OUT" OF WHOOOOOSANE AND JUST A FEW OF HIS "DIRTY BUDIES"!
I LOVE AMERICA! I LOVE AND HIGHLY RESPECT THE MANY WHO GAVE THIER LIFES TO PROTECT MY AND OTHER AMERICANS' FREEDOMS!!!
BUT I FEEL VERY COCERNED ABOUT RUSHING TO THE "FLAG WAVING, YELLOW RIBBON HYSTERIA OF THE OF THE RIGHT WING MEDIA WHORES AND THEIR POLITICIAN AND RICH FRIENDS WHO DO NOT SEEM TO CARE ABOUT HOW MANY DIE AND/OR LOSE LIBERTY JUST IF THEY CAN BE MADE EVEN RICHER!!!
===> IF PERCHANCE IDIOT w., Dubya, Scrub, best part of him ran down his "jerk dad's leg" JUST HAPPENS TO START ANOTHER WAR....
CONGRESS SHOULD ===> NOT <=== GIVE A SINGLE PENNEY TO HIM TO DO THIS INSANE ACTION AND IMMEDIATELY START IMPEACHMENT PROCEDINGS FOR HIM AND MOST OF HIS ADMISTRATION!
PEACE AND LOVE!!!
Kirk
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc
http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kirksresume.htm
http://www.hated.com
http://www.antiwar.com
WHO OF YOU WILL BE FIRST TO HAVE GUTS AND BE REAL "MAN" OR REAL "WOMAN" TO START IMPEACHMENT PROCEDINGS OF GEORGE W. BUSH AND DICKEY CHENEY?!?!?!!!
Love you all,
Kirk Gregory Czuhai (kirk)
11369 Caberfae
Allendale, MI 
616-895-5933
Big picture of me, YOU JUST GOTTA HAVE ONE! AT: http://www.altelco.net/~lovekgc/kirk.htm